Blogged Critique on Simon Heads “The Rise of the
Reengineers”
During the late 1900’s, there were
many people who strongly opposed our modern economy. Simon Head, the author of The New Ruthless Economy (2003), believes
we should be coming up with alternatives to the cruel American economy. “The
Rise of the New Reengineers”, a chapter from Simon Heads book, describes disparities
between management and workers in an office space, and information technologies
role in the growing disparities between management and lower level workers. The New Ruthless Economy was written at
a time when the average American wage was growing at a miniscule rate, while
management position wages soared in comparison. Head recollects the work of William Henry
Leffingwell, a man who used the ideas of Frederick Winslow Taylor in order to
substantially increase productivity in the workplace. He did this by taking
away the allowance for unreliability of the “human element” and taking away
their independent decision-making.
The accomplishments of Leffingwell
are his innovations in applying scientific management to service industries in
the early 1900’s. Leffingwell’s ambitions were to run an office much like a
Ford factory, with progressive assembly practices he learned from Taylor; practices
still in use in today’s economy to make production as efficient as possible. The
processes of Leffingwell became extremely specific, replacing evaporation
inkwells with non-evaporating, teaching “how to best open an envelope”,
reducing the necessary motions of opening mail from thirteen to 6, overall
increasing the hourly output of mail from 100 to 200 pieces. His actions and
successes’ as a scientific manager were much more than that, he could work with
a company and instruct them on how to best fulfill and satisfy a customers
order. Leffingwell obsession to detail set him apart from Taylor, in a way that
allowed his processes to adapt to the different and unexpected tasks required
by customers, still ensuring the companies success, and ensured his popularity
among major corporations.
Much of Leffingwell’s success came
from setting apart management and workers. The term “reengineering” refers to
the improvement of management, and in Leffingwells eyes, it refers to a
white-collar assembly line. Modern day reengineering looks at the relationship
between management and workers in terms of monitoring and surveillance. He
wanted to put “exclusive concentration of power in the hands of management”
therefore leaving “independent decision making by employees reduced to a
minimum.” An idea that rose many years, ago, but continues to fuel long hours at
low pay, being able to work at a job with little knowledge or effort but still
being productive under effective management.
Head refers to this unfair work as
the ruthless economy, an economy that
Americans need to stray from. In
lecture, we watched a clip from Modern Times, a satire on the job of the
president at a major company. The president simply did puzzles as he monitored
the workers via video, and would repeatedly tell them to work harder, the advances
in Information Technology has dramatically affected this office relationship.
Managerial processes are becoming more and more significant as greater
technology improves the difficulty of workers jobs. Head recounts three chief
aspects of the use of information technology as a reengineering tool, first in
terms of the changing skills needed of workers, in terms of structure of the
workplace, and in the monitoring and surveillance. Over the years as the use of
reengineers and information technology has grown faster and become more
prominent, it has dramatically undermines the security and importance of low
skill workers globally.
Nicole Hulick
No comments:
Post a Comment